This Issue:
Parental Substance Abuse - February 2001

See the newsletter issue on Children and Substance Abuse for more coverage of this topic.

THE DCFS PERSPECTIVE
DCFS Services to Substance Abusing Families

LITERATURE SUMMARIES
Policy Issues
1. CASA's New Report on Substance Abuse
2. A New Report to Congress on Subsance Abuse
3. How to Comply With ASFA?

Assessment
4. Screening and Assessing Substance Abuse
5. Project Connect's Risk Assessment Tool

Treatment
6. Types of Alcohol and Drug Treatment
7. Methadone Treatment
8. How to do Motivational Interviewing

Program Evaluations
9. Mothers Value Caring Workers
10. Project Connect Uses a Generalist Approach
11. AOD Treatment May Not Prevent Placement
12. The Seattle Advocacy Model Helps Mothers
13. Residential Treatment Works
14. Some Mothers Have Better Prospects

WEB RESOURCES

DCFS Services to Substance Affected Families     top
Contributors:
Janet Chandler, DCFS Clinical Division
Don Dieneita, Title IV-E Waiver Consultant
Rodney Dobson, OASA
Sam Gillespie, DCFS Division of Health Policy
Peggy Powers, OASA

Parental substance abuse has a major impact on child welfare practice across the nation and in Illinois. A recent survey of child welfare workers in Illinois found that 74% of their cases involved parental substance abuse. Although recovery from alcohol and other drug abuse (AODA) is a lifetime process, the Illinois Permanency Initiative requires that children in custody be reunified with their parents, be made available for adoption, or have some other permanent home arrangement made within 12 months of entering foster care. This conflict between the permanency needs of children and the recovery needs of parents makes working with substance abusing families especially difficult.

DCFS/OASA Programs Address the Challenges
The research and program literature summarized in this newsletter issue identifies the challenges faced by child welfare agencies as they try to keep children safe when they are in substance abusing families. DCFS and the state Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse (OASA) are vigorously working to meet these challenges. For example, the DCFS/OASA Initiative is designed to address all the challenges outlined in article #2, "A New Report to Congress," including cross training, assessment, treatment delay, confidentiality, length of treatment and special efforts to get and keep parents in treatment. The Seattle Advocacy Model discussed in article #12 is similar to the Illinois Project SAFE, which uses a program of outpatient services supported by energetic outreach, childcare and transportation. The DCFS/OASA Initiative and Project SAFE are both discussed below.

The Policy Guide 99.13
As of 12/1/99, the Policy Guide 99.13 Services For DCFS Substance Affected Families covers DCFS procedures for identifying, assessing, referring for treatment, and coordinating the care of substance abusing clients. Continuous assessment of risks in the family environment using the Guide to Risk Factors for Substance Affected Families and Substance Exposed Infants is the key to protecting children in these families. A new DCFS Handbook for Serving Substance Affected Families is now being prepared.

Substance Exposed Infants and Substance Use by Children and Youth
Additional assessment and practice protocols apply when an infant is born to substance abusing parents. See the newsletter issue on Children and Substance Abuse for coverage of this topic as well as substance use by children and youth.

The DCFS/OASA Initiative Integrates Services
In 1995, OASA received increased state funding to expand treatment capacity and offer faster access to treatment for DCFS clients. The Initiative also supports improved case management and outreach, improved communication between OASA and DCFS, and staff training in both agencies. Thirty-four substance abuse treatment providers are involved in the Initiative services offered at 68 state locations and 23 Project SAFE sites.

The Initiative includes these important features:

Project SAFE
Project SAFE (Substance and Alcohol-Free Environment) began in 1986 as a Federal demonstration project to serve substance-abusing women with children, using intensive outpatient services. A key feature of the program is the intensive outreach to keep clients engaged in the program, which may also include transportation to treatment and childcare during treatment. Treatment components include a parenting curriculum, substance abuse education, individual and family counseling, specialized women's groups, skill-building and self-help groups. Project SAFE has demonstrated its effectiveness in promoting recovery for mothers and safety for children. There are now 21 AOD agencies and 23 treatment sites statewide.

The I AM ABLE Project
This project offers services to African American families, including substance-abusing families, using the Family Group Conference model. The model originated in New Zealand as a way to involve aboriginal Maori families in decisions about child welfare and juvenile justice, based on their traditional strong sense of family and community.

Several states are using the model in various ways. The following components are usually included:

The model was first used in Illinois at North Lawndale in 1996 and was transferred to the I AM ABLE Family Development Corporation in 1998. I AM ABLE uses the Family Conference model for casework and the family systems model for clinical treatment. Outcomes from the first demonstration project at I AM ABLE show promise although the data are not yet clear. A second demonstration project began in January, 2000.

Child Welfare and AODA Title IV-E Waiver
This program is a new, five-year, Federally-funded demonstration project intended to expand the services provided through the DCFS/OASA Initiative. The phrase, "Title IV-E Waiver," means that some requirements of the Social Security Act are waived in order to allow development and evaluation of innovative programs.

Eligibility - Families eligible to participate in this project will:

  • have case opening dates on or after April 28, 2000
  • be located in Cook county
  • have custodial parents involved with alcohol or other drugs
  • involve children in temporary custody.

Control Group - The demonstration project uses both control and experimental groups to which cases are assigned randomly by an independent research firm.

  • Control Group members receive existing child welfare and AODA services based on the OASA/DCFS Initiative.
  • Experimental Group A members receive existing Initiative services plus Recovery Coach services.
  • Experimental Group B members receive existing Initiative services, plus Recovery Coach services, plus in years 2-5, enhanced services that will be developed during year one of the project.

New Recovery Coaches - Traditionally, child welfare workers focus on children and OADA treatment providers focus on parents. However, the Recovery Coach is a professional who does not work for either DCFS or the AODA treatment providers, and thus sees the entire family as his or her service responsibility. Recovery Coaches do not replace the child welfare or AODA staff, but have primary responsibility for providing and coordinating services to the families. Coaches connect to parents immediately (within 48 hours of referral), stay with them to the end, and are aggressive and persistent in engaging and re-engaging them in treatment. They see parents at home regularly and can assess the risks present in the family environment.

Enhanced Services Possible - The specific enhanced services available during years 2-5 of the project will be developed with input from various community members. They may include the following options:

  • Medically Managed Detoxification - Some clients have declined non-medical detoxification programs due to the physical discomfort involved.
  • Drug-Free Housing may be available for families when parents complete residential treatment or for those with unsupportive home environments.
  • Memorandums of Agreement and/or Graduated Sanctions may be used to help inform and motivate parents.
  • Reunification/Concurrent Planning Specialists - Case workers must plan concurrently for reunification as well as adoption should reunification fail. A team of specialists in this area may be available for consultation.
  • Public Health Nurses working for the city and county public health departments, but dedicated to serving DCFS clients, may be hired to follow substance exposed infants up to age 2.
  • Paternal Involvement - Services may be offered to fathers who want to be involved, including: parent training, job search and career counseling, GED and referral to training/apprenticeship programs, screening for AODA and Recovery Coach services.

New Concerns: Methadone and MISA
Two new areas of concern for child welfare agencies dealing with substance-abusing parents include methadone maintenance treatment and clients who suffer from both mental illness and substance abuse.

Methadone - Although studies clearly show that methadone is the best treatment available for heroin addiction, there is an unfortunate bias against and misunderstanding about methadone among the public and practitioners. The Office of the Inspector General is currently working to supply more methadone maintenance treatment options for DCFS clients. See article #7 for more about methadone treatment.

MISA - Professionals are becoming more aware of the number of parents who suffer from both mental illness and substance abuse (MISA), and their special needs. However, there is still a split between the treatment fields; drug treatment providers may not understand or serve clients who are also on mental illness medications and mental illness treatment providers may not understand or serve clients who are chemically dependent. OASA now has a staff person coordinating MISA programs throughout the state. MISA topics will be covered in a future newsletter issue.


1. CASA's New Report on Substance Abuse in Child Welfare     top

Reid, Jeanne (Principal Investigator) (1999). No Safe Haven: Children of Substance-Abusing Parents. The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University. 167P. Available on the Web at http://www.casacolumbia.org/publications1456/publications_show.htm?doc_id=7167

CASA (The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University) conducted this major 2-year study which included a survey of child welfare and court professionals, six case studies of innovative programs, and a literature review of over 800 publications.

Substance Abuse Increases Child Maltreatment
In 1986 there were 1.4 million maltreated children in the U.S. In 1997 that figure had doubled to 3.0 million. Most of the increase in child maltreatment is due to the substantial rise in substance abuse in the U.S., which was initiated by the epidemic of crack use, but which has continued at a high level even though crack use declined during the 1990s.

Substance Abuse is a Factor in 70% of Cases
Substance abuse substantially impedes our efforts to protect children. Researchers variously estimate the percentage of total child maltreatment cases involving substance abuse at 50% to 90%. CASA estimates that 70% of cases are caused by or aggravated by parental substance abuse. Most substance-abusing parents use alcohol as well as other drugs. Substance abuse also drives the increase in repeated incidents of maltreatment. Child welfare agencies must now spend more of their resources investigating reports and removing children, and have fewer resources to provide services to families.

Neglect is 4.2 Times More Likely
Child neglect is almost inevitable when parents are substance-abusers, 4.2 times more likely than in non-substance-abusing families in similar circumstances. Neglect occurs due to brief lapses in supervision as well as extended absences from home. Parents have little time, money or energy to devote to their children due to time spent binging, recovering from binging and trying to get money for drugs via illegal activities. Their children may be molested by others because parents are not providing protection.

Abuse is 2.7 Times More Likely
Abuse is usually triggered by a child's behavior, and drugs may increase parental violence by lowering inhibitions, reducing thinking ability and increasing aggression, paranoia, and irritability. Parents may take children with them on drug activities where they can be injured. Abuse is 2.7 times more likely in these families than in non-substance abusing families in similar circumstances.

Substance Abuse Increases Case Complexity
Parents, most of them women, who are now seen in child welfare cases are more troubled than ever before. Many have multiple problems including:

  • isolation
  • unemployment
  • chronic health problems
  • mental health problems
  • childhood sexual abuse/incest
  • substance-abusing families of origin
  • relationships with substance-abusing and violent men
  • HIV positive
  • prostitution.

More Young Children are Maltreated
Most victims of maltreatment are now under age 5. Infants are the fastest growing population in foster care, and many are exposed to drugs during pregnancy. Exposed infants are 2 to 3 times more likely to suffer maltreatment than other children in similar conditions.

Six Weaknesses in Child Welfare
CASA's study found six critical weaknesses in child welfare practice and family courts that compromise our efforts to protect children.

1. Lack of Effective Screening and Assessment
CASA found that 42% of the professionals they surveyed either are not required to report substance abuse or don't know if they are required to report it. Although many of those surveyed had received some training on screening and assessment, the training was cursory. When screening is done, it is commonly just simple conversational questions. If alcohol use is found, it may not be taken seriously. This lack of screening expertise means that workers

will not find substance abuse because abusers may deny it or hide it. Also, because the patterns of use, abuse, or addiction may be complex, without expertise in assessment, workers will not be able to make good decisions about risk, treatment and other case factors.

2. Lack of Timely Access to Treatment
Treatment and other services for substance-abusing parents are in short supply. Only 31% of substance-abusing parents and 20% of pregnant women in the child welfare system receive treatment and the treatment offered is only whatever happens to be available, not what is best for them. Treatment programs generally have waiting lists of 1-3 months. Most programs are designed for men, and do not meet the needs of women in the child welfare system who may require residential treatment and aftercare, mental and physical health services, child care, pediatric services, individual and women's group therapy, marital/family counseling, parenting education, and literacy and job training. Studies of women receiving federally-funded treatment show it can be effective and cost effective.

3. Lack of Ways to Motivate Parents
In CASA's survey, 85% of respondents said their most difficult problem is motivating parents. CASA's review of innovative programs shows that using paraprofessionals who are in recovery as home visitors shows promise in motivating parents, and treatment programs tailored for women increase retention rates.

4. Lack of Criteria for Reunification
Child welfare practice lacks standard criteria on when children can be returned to their families. Also, without a good understanding of substance abuse and recovery, child welfare workers are unable to make helpful decisions about parents' progress. Federal law also discourages treatment programs from disclosing information about the progress of parents in their programs, which hampers decision-making in these cases.

5. Lack of Preparation for Relapse
The child welfare system, lacking an expert understanding of substance abuse, generally fails to anticipate and plan for relapse after treatment is completed. Relapse is not considered a sign of failed treatment among addiction treatment programs, but part of the recovery process, and is most common during the first three months after treatment. Child welfare services should spend resources on providing three months of monitoring and aftercare services rather than on re-opening cases. These may include participation in 12-step programs, child care, preparing a plan for assistance from friends or relatives, or using paraprofessional home visitors.

6. Lack of Standards for Reasonable Efforts to Preserve Families
CASA's survey shows that child welfare professionals do not agree on how to help substance-abusing parents, or on what parental behaviors should trigger moving toward termination of parental rights. Unfortunately, child welfare professionals must negotiate two clocks: the child development clock runs quickly, while the recovery clock for their parents runs slowly.

Innovative Programs
The report also covers innovative child welfare programs in Sacramento County, New Jersey, and Connecticut, as well as the new family drug courts.


2. A New Report to Congress on Substance Abuse in Child Welfare     top

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (1999). Blending Perspectives and Building Common Ground: A Report to Congress on Substance Abuse and Child Protection. 179P. Available on the Web at http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/subabuse99/subabuse.htm

Chapter 7: Service Delivery Models: Approaches to Addressing Joint Substance Abuse and Child Maltreatment Problems.

Child Welfare and AOD Staff Lack Training
Child welfare workers are inadequately trained to recognize and assess substance abuse in their clients. Alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment staff have inadequate training to recognize and respond to child maltreatment in their clients. Neither field has adequate knowledge or training to serve the clients that are affected by both fields. Joint training is important to ensure that the groups will be able to collaborate effectively. The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect has funded 25 multi-disciplinary training programs, and found they were effective at increasing worker awareness, increasing accuracy of screening, improving assessment skills, and increasing knowledge of available community services.

Assessment is Minimal
In its survey of state child welfare agencies published in 1998, the Child Welfare League of America found that child welfare risk assessments rarely or only briefly mention substance abuse. When risk assessments do include substance abuse, workers may simply report that they do not have enough information to assess this risk factor, because in court, they may be questioned about their qualifications to make such an assessment.

Treatment Delay Reduces Client Motivation
Long wait times to get into treatment mean that clients will lose their motivation to cooperate, which is highest during the crisis time when first being referred to child protection.

Confidentiality
Child welfare workers must get consent from their clients for release of information from their AOD treatment program at the time that clients are referred, so information about their progress can be obtained to make decisions about the case.

Treatment is Effective if it is Long Enough
Because AOD treatment programs have high drop-out rates, perhaps 50% to 80%, child welfare staff may believe that treatment is not effective. But studies show that treatment can be effective and cost effective. The longer the stay in treatment, the greater the improvement, and at least three months is needed for long term results. Providing services to children of mothers in treatment has been shown to attract and hold more mothers in treatment, as can the fear of losing custody of their children.

Special Efforts Get and Keep Parents in Treatment
Results from the Illinois Project SAFE and Illinois Treatment Expansion Initiative show that by making a persistent and intensive effort to engage substance abusing parents, the parents can make progress. Of the first clients in the program, 81% completed treatment and 54% of their children in foster care were reunified with parents. Read about this program in the GAO report listed on page 12.

Long-Term Intervention is Needed
Relapse is a process in which the recovering person becomes unable to cope with life while sober and cannot avoid using alcohol or drugs again. During the early stage of recovery, adequate social and recovery skills are needed to establish a sober life style and prevent relapse, and these skills can be taught. A parent may not be able to stay sober if the negative factors in her life are not improved:

  • inadequate, unsafe housing
  • stress of raising children alone
  • poor employment
  • health/mental health problems
  • domestic violence.

Also, if post traumatic stress syndrome resulting from past or current physical or sexual abuse is not treated, it may lead to continued relapse.


3. How to Comply With ASFA?     top

Hollinshead, Dana M. (1998). "Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse and the Termination of Parental Rights: A Challenge for Implementation of the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997. Protecting Children v14 n3 p15-21.

The Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA) requires that child welfare agencies hold a permanency hearing when children have been in foster care for 12 months, and petition for terminating parental rights (TPR) when a child has been in foster care for 15 of the most recent 22 months. TPR may be avoided when 1) a child is being cared for by a relative 2) when there is a compelling reason that it is not in the child's interest, and 3) when the state has not provided the services needed to reunify the family.

ASFA Does Not Take AOD Abuse Into Account
Even though AOD abuse is a contributing factor in 40-80% of all child protection cases, the ASFA makes almost no mention of it and how it should influence decisions made about the parents of children in care. Both the child welfare system and AOD services are unprepared to meet the needs of these parents. Families affected by AOD abuse are thus more likely to be referred to TRP proceedings, and may receive unfair or ineffective treatment in the child protection system. This inequity may be intensified because most of these families are people of color, and because child welfare practice may be culturally insensitive.

How to Give Parents a Reasonable Chance?
The ASFA requires that parents be given a reasonable chance to recover before their parental rights are terminated. In order to deal fairly and effectively with these parents, both child welfare and AOD programs must address these issues:

  • develop assessment tools and protocols for AOD-abusing parents
  • provide cross-training for workers
  • define reasonable timelines and realistic expectations for parent rehabilitation
  • ensure the cultural sensitivity of workers
  • determine which circumstances will constitute a compelling reason not to TPR.


4. Screening and Assessing Substance Abuse     top

Young, Nancy, Sidney L. Gardner and Kimberly Dennis (1998). "Assessment: Bridging Child Welfare and AOD Services." Pages 111-130 in Responding to Alcohol and Other Drug Problems in Child Welfare: Weaving Together Practice and Policy. Washington, DC: CWLA Press 179P.

A new book available free from the Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse at 800-638-8736, order # ncj171669.

Always Screen For and Assess AOD Use
Child welfare services should make screening for AOD problems a standardized element of every risk assessment. The screening must be followed by an assessment of the nature and degree of the client's substance abuse problems. Without this assessment in addition to a screening for the existence of AOD use, one cannot help the client connect with the most appropriate services in the AOD system. If the AOD system is responsible for the assessment, it is less likely that all the needs of the client and her family can be met, because AOD services are less sensitive to the needs of children and families.

Screening and Diagnostic Tools
AOD services commonly use the CAGE Questionnaire and the Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory to screen for substance abuse. Following the screening, AOD services commonly use tools such as these to clarify the extent and nature of AOD problems:

  • Addiction Severity Index
  • American Society of Addiction Medicine Patient Placement Criteria
  • Individual Assessment Profile
  • American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV Criteria.

The Project Connect Risk Assessment Tool
Unfortunately, no standard tools exist that were designed expressly for evaluating the risk of child maltreatment in terms of parental substance abuse. However, the Project Connect program in Rhode Island has developed a tool for its own use. See Article 5 for more information.

Screen During Investigation of Allegations
During investigation of allegations of child maltreatment, use screening questions, such as a modified GAGE to screen for AOD problems.

Assess Risk to the Child
As part of determining risk to children, obtain more information about the type and frequency of parental substance abuse. The following situations may indicate greater risk of maltreatment:

  • heavy alcohol use accompanied by a history of violence
  • use of stimulants such as cocaine, crack, and methamphetamine
  • abuse of AOD started during teen years.

Assess AOD Use Versus Abuse/Dependence
As part of determining if there is a legal basis for petition and appropriate placement, determine if the parent's AOD involvement is substance use, abuse, or dependence. Use the Diagnostic Tools mentioned above. If substance abuse/dependency is present, the case requires further AOD-specific services. The placement decision should include a consideration of the parent's level of AOD involvement.

Assess Impact of AOD on Life Functioning
As part of planning and managing the case, determine the areas of life functioning affected by the parent's AOD use. Use this information to make decisions about the level of structure or intensity of AOD services needed, and the areas of life functioning that need specific interventions.


5. Project Connect's Risk Assessment Tool     top

Olsen, Lenore, Darlene Allen and Lenette Azzi-Lessing. (1996) "Assessing Risk in Families Affected by Substance Abuse." Child Abuse and Neglect v20 n9 p833-842.

Order a copy of the risk assessment tool from Children's Friend and Service, 153 Summer Street, Providence, RI. 401-331-2900.

Project Connect in Rhode Island developed the Risk Inventory for Substance Abuse-Affected Families to help meet the needs of their clients. They find that some parents have good parenting skills but make poor progress recovering from substance abuse, while other parents make good progress on substance abuse, but have poor parenting abilities that pose a risk to their children. The risk inventory helps workers make informed placement decisions about these families, and gives them better information about the families' service needs.

Eight Scales Are Used
The inventory includes eight scales that are evaluated with four or five descriptive statements, from no risk to high risk, taking a trained worker only 15 minutes to complete. Families should be given a chance to stabilize before they are evaluated.

  • Commitment to Recovery - A parent's commitment to recovery may range from complete denial to full commitment. Lack of commitment may lead workers to plan for adoption, while strong motivation to change, even when there is a relapse, may indicate otherwise.
  • Patterns of Use - Abstinence is the goal for these parents, although controlled use is the goal for the general population.
  • Effect on Child Caring and Effect on Life-Style - These two scales assess the effect of substance abuse on a parent's ability to meet her children's needs, to carry out her responsibilities, and the intrusiveness of substance abuse into her daily life.
  • Supports for Recovery - The presence of friends and family may not mean a parent has support for recovery. Friends and family may seem supportive, but may actually have an investment in preventing her from changing, especially if they are part of a substance-abusing culture. The goal is to maximize the amount of time a parent can spend with people who support recovery.
  • Parent's Self-Efficacy and Parent's Self-Care - These two scales assess a parent's personal well-being, including feelings of helplessness, ability to seek resources and make decisions, and tend to her own health care and other needs. Progress in recovery often brings improvements in these areas. Some of the Project Connect parents were eventually able to support other parents and speak at conferences.
  • Neighborhood Safety - Dangerous neighborhoods with crack houses, drive-by shootings, and street violence make parents focus on survival. The additional stress, the availability of drugs, and the lack of personal safety to do such activities as attend evening support meetings all hamper recovery.


6. Types of Alcohol and Drug Treatment     top

Committee to Identify Strategies to Raise the Profile of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism Research (1997). "Treating Addictive Disorders." Pages 73-93 in Dispelling the Myths About Addiction: Strategies to Increase Understanding and Strengthen Research. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine.

Treatment is as Effective as for Diabetes
It is a persistent myth that addiction cannot be treated. Addiction is similar to hypertension, diabetes and asthma in that these conditions cannot be cured, but all can be treated successfully and often require re-treatment. Successful treatment for addiction is a 50% reduction in substance use after six months. Treatment is successful for 40-70% of substance abuse patients. A longer stay in treatment is the major predictor of treatment success. Programs addressing other needs such as housing and job training have greater success. Success depends both on program characteristics and patient characteristics.

Three Stages of Treatment

  • Detoxification or acute stabilization may include a hospital stay for alcoholism or gradual withdrawal using a substitute drug. The patient's physiological, emotional and motivational status is addressed.
  • The Rehabilitation stage continues to address the patient's physiological, emotional and motivational status and adds education about avoiding relapse, as well as behavioral and other therapy, often making use of support groups.
  • The goal of Follow-Up Care is to prevent relapse, which is the real target of treatment because long-term abstinence is difficult.

Types of Treatment

  • Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous or 12-step programs are often used as aftercare, and help people who participate voluntarily, but not compulsory attendees.
  • Alcohol Detoxification programs are initial hospital stays designed to meet the medical needs of withdrawal of alcohol use, which is not required for cocaine.
  • The Minnesota Inpatient model is common in the U. S. for inpatient alcohol treatment. It lasts 21 days and includes group therapy with peer confrontation.
  • Chemical Dependency programs were originally designed for alcoholism, but are now also used for drug addictions. They are intensive 3-6 week programs in which patients help develop their treatment plans on 12-step models.
  • Therapeutic Communities are residential programs and also address other problems such as arrests, unemployment, and skills training. They are very structured, provide extensive support, and focus on relationships and self help. Most last 15 months or more. Therapeutic communities produce good results with the addiction as well as improvements in employment, school enrollment, and self-esteem.

Recommended Psychosocial Treatments
The American Psychiatric Association recommends that psychosocial treatment be a part of addiction therapy. The following have demonstrated their effectiveness:

  • Behavioral Marital Therapy improves marital communication and problem solving.
  • Brief Interventions provided by health care professionals include providing information about a patient's addiction problem and encouraging her to take responsibility.
  • In the Community Reinforcement Approach, the patient and therapist develop strategies appropriate for that individual, perhaps using a medication to reduce craving combined with leisure activities.
  • Self-Control Training aims to reduce use by teaching goal setting, self-monitoring, and new coping skills.
  • Social Skills Training is used to support developing appropriate relationships.
  • Stress Management skills training is used to reduce stress.

Treating depression, anxiety and other mental health issues at the same time may improve recovery.

Pharmacotherapy for Heroin and Opioid Drugs
Methadone is available as a non-euphoric substitute for these drugs. It is used for detoxification or medically supervised withdrawal and is not an effective treatment by itself. Outpatient methadone maintenance or maintenance pharmacotherapy is usually for patients who are unsuccessful with drug-free treatment, and the program includes maintenance doses, urine tests and counseling and rehabilitation.

Naltrexone is a non-euphoric, selective opioid antagonist which has been used for narcotic dependence since 1984. It is more effective with motivated patients and when used with other non-drug therapies.

Pharmacotherapy For Alcohol and Cocaine
There are no replacement drugs such as methadone for alcohol or cocaine, but Naltrexone was approved in 1994 for use with alcohol addiction as an opiate antagonist which reduces craving and drinking.

Disulfiram (Antabuse) is a different type of drug which causes unpleasant and potentially life-threatening symptoms when alcohol is also taken. It may help motivated, closely monitored patients.

No drugs have yet been found to help cocaine addiction, but treating other mental health problems with appropriate drugs may be a help for both cocaine and alcohol addictions.


7. Methadone Treatment     top

Coffin, Phil (1997). "Research Brief: Methadone Maintenance Treatment. The Lindesmith Center. http://www.lindesmith.org/cites_sources/brief14.html

Effective Medical Treatment of Opiate Addiction. NIH Consensus Statement 1997 Nov 17-19; 15(6):1-38. http://odp.od/nih/gov/consensus/cons/108/108_statement.htm

The Treatment of Choice for Heroin
Once individuals are addicted to heroin or other opiate drugs, opiate dependence is a true medical condition based on a brain-related disorder. Research studies have very clearly shown that methadone and similar drugs are the most effective and safe treatments for opiate addictions. Methadone can be used for initial detoxification, which takes about 3 days. However, for opiates, relapse after detoxification is almost inevitable, and the real value of methadone is in maintenance treatment.

Methadone reduces chronic narcotic craving without causing euphoria or otherwise interfering with normal functioning. The dose level and number of years of maintenance treatment must be individually determined. Numerous studies have established that using methadone as a maintenance treatment to prevent relapse has many benefits and minimal negative health consequences, even when used for 20 years or more. In the U.S., treatment is usually provided in special methadone maintenance clinics.

Treatment Has Many Benefits
The benefits of methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) are well documented, and include:

  • Reduced Mortality - The death rate for untreated addicted persons is over 3 times higher than that of those on MMT.
  • Reduced Drug Use - On MMT, use of heroin is reduced to 15% of the untreated level, and other drug use is also reduced.
  • Reduced Crime - 95% of untreated heroin users commit crimes, usually to support the habit, which is significantly reduced with MMT.
  • Improved Health - MMT reduces the incidence of various infections, tuberculosis, hepatitis, sexually transmitted, alcohol abuse, needle-sharing and risk of HIV transmission, with a subsequent reduction in health care costs. MMT is safe during pregnancy and reduces complications.
  • Improved Employment - Patients on MMT earn over twice the annual income of untreated drug users, who commonly cannot hold jobs.
  • Low Cost - The cost of treatment averages only $4,000 per patient per year.

Barriers to Providing MMT
Unfortunately, the MMT capacity in the U.S. is inadequate to serve the addicted population. The public and policy-makers often subscribe to many misconceptions or prejudices about MMT, such as:

  • Opiate addiction is a self-caused disease or a lack of morality, rather than a medical condition.
  • MMT is ineffective and just substitutes one narcotic for another.
  • Effective treatment should lead to complete abstinence from all drugs.
  • Methadone dispensed at clinics will be diverted to illegal street use, although the drug is generally of interest only to addicted people who cannot attend regular treatment programs.

NIH Recommendations
The expert panel convened to address the MMT issue in 1997 made these recommendations:

  • All opiate-dependent persons under legal supervision should have access to methadone maintenance therapy and national policy should be revised to support this.
  • There is a shortage of health care professionals who understand opiate addiction and therapy, and more training is needed.
  • Federal regulation of methadone is extreme and hampers the effectiveness of treatment programs, even to the point of prescribing the maximum allowed dosage. Regulations should be revised to allow better performance of these clinics, and to allow physicians and pharmacies to prescribe and dispense methadone in maintenance therapy.


8. How to Do Motivational Interviewing     top

Hohman, Melinda M. (1998). "Motivational Interviewing: An Intervention Tool for Child Welfare Case Workers Working with Substance-Abusing Parents." Child Welfare v77 n3 p275-289.

In the past, counselors were trained to use direct confrontation to try to break down client's defenses and denial of addiction, but this usually increases resistance. Instead, begin by trying to assess the Stage of Change that a client may be in:

  • Precontemplation: clients are not aware that they have a problem, have no intention of changing, and are defensive.
  • Contemplation: clients are aware they have problems but need more thinking before they can change, and feel anxiety about change.
  • Preparation: clients consider the problems and benefits of addiction, determine that the problems outweigh the benefits and decide that it is time for change.
  • Action: clients take steps such as becoming abstinent or cutting down on drug use, and continue these steps for six months.
  • Maintenance: clients are comfortable with the changes already made, but must persist to sustain the changes, which can take anywhere from six months to a lifetime.

Most clients seen by child welfare workers will be in the precontemplation or contemplation stages. Even with only brief contact, motivational interviewing can help increase your client's readiness and motivation to change. In your conversations, apply the six elements and the five principles of motivational interviewing listed below.

The Six FRAMES Elements

  • Feedback: provide information about how drug and alcohol use is affecting the client, particularly physical test results.
  • Responsibility: communicate that the client is responsible for her choices; the worker will not make her do anything.
  • Advice: the client will need and solicit advice on how to handle an addiction problem.
  • Menu: instead of telling clients what to do, offer a menu of treatment options.
  • Empathize with the struggle and the difficulties experienced by the client.
  • Self-efficacy: help clients believe that they can change.

The Five Principles

  • Express Empathy by establishing rapport and using active listening techniques.
  • Develop Discrepancy by discussing the pros and cons of drug use, how drug use is affecting the client, and the client's mixed feelings about changing, focusing on how as a parent the client will want the best for her children. This may move a client from contemplation to preparation.
  • Avoid Argumentation and labeling.
  • Roll with Resistance by changing to a less emotional topic or by reflecting both the positives and negatives raised by the client.
  • Support Self-efficacy by affirming that clients are able to succeed. When clients reach the action stage, help with referrals to appropriate treatment and provide interest and support.

Case Study: Working With Mary
When the social worker first met Mary, she claimed to be 'clean' but her shaking hands and dilated pupils indicated this was probably untrue. She was probably in precontemplation. For the first visit they established rapport by discussing Mary's previous addiction and treatment experiences. At the next visit, the worker discussed Mary's family and her mother, who had been an alcoholic. By rolling with resistance and expressing empathy about the stress Mary was experiencing, the worker made it possible for Mary to admit her current drug use and her concerns about its affect on her child. She moved from precontemplation to contemplation.

Clients Move Back and Forth Between Stages
Parents move back and forth through the stages of change, showing insight one day and resentful denial the next. Relapse is possible at any of these stages, and does not indicate failure.


9. Mothers Value Caring Workers     top

Akin, Becci A.and Thomas K. Gregoire (1997). Parents' Views on Child Welfare's Response to Addiction. Families in Society v78 n4 p393-404.

Substance-abusing parents are often treated punitively by the child welfare system, as if addiction were willful immoral behavior. On the other hand, their substance abuse may be ignored or seen as an unrelated issue. In order to help child welfare workers better understand the experience of substance-abusing parents, the authors interviewed 11 mothers who succeeded at recovery and regained custody of their children.

Addiction is Overwhelming
The mothers described their addictions as an omnipresent, omnipotent force that consumed their lives, acting as both a friend and a 'living hell.' They felt shameful, guilty, and powerless. They believed that growing up in substance-abusing families taught them that addiction is normal. Although they wanted to quit, a life without drugs seemed desolate, and they did not know of services to help them. They were afraid that admitting their addiction would create other problems such as the possibility of losing their children.

The Child Welfare System Seems Uncaring
When the mothers lost custody of their children, they grieved and felt afraid, desperate, helpless and powerless. They felt that the child welfare system was uncaring, more concerned about paperwork than helping people, and that it did not keep its promises. They felt overwhelmed by what they were expected to do, and that they did not get credit for what they achieved.

Caring Workers Made the Difference
Caring and supportive social workers were what helped these mothers deal with an uncaring system and succeed. They valued the following qualities in their social workers:

  • Trustworthiness, based on honesty, sincerity, and careful listening.
  • Availability, by making frequent calls and visits, listening intently and consistently working to help.
  • Caring, expressing genuine concern about the family. Workers should also help parents get the resources they need, not just substance abuse treatment.
  • Unshakable Faith that the mother can change, even during relapses. Workers should communicate hope.
  • Focus on Strengths rather than deficits and failures. Clients can even give advice about how to deal with similar parents, and how to improve child welfare services.
  • Willingness to Share Power with the mother, providing choices and decision-making authority to help her regain a feeling of control and power. Workers should use their power to enhance parents' power.
  • Providing Direction by setting incremental goals and helping mothers take their case plans step by step. Addicted parents may have learned to live moment-to-moment and be unprepared to live with long term goals.
  • An Understanding of Addiction, showing that they know how very difficult it is to recover and change one's whole life, that relapse is not a failure, and that addicted people are still worthy of respect.


10. Project Connect Uses a Generalist Approach     top

Mumm, Ann Marie, Lenore J. Olsen and Darlene Allen (1998). Families Affected by Substance Abuse: Implications for Generalist Social Work Practice. Families in Society v79 n4 p384-394.

More Children are Reunified Sooner
Rhode Island's Project Connect serves substance-abusing families referred from the Department of Children, Youth, and Families (DCYF). Sixty percent of the participants have successfully completed Project services and reduced their risks in substance abuse, housing, health, and parenting. Project children were more likely to be reunified with their families than non-Project children (45% versus 13%) and within shorter time periods than non-Project children (5 months versus 11 months).

Generalists Consider Societal Problems
Project Connect believes their success is due to their generalist approach. Workers consider both individual problems and the societal problems, such as oppression, that contribute to individual problems.

Engaging Respectfully With Clients
Staff treat families with dignity and respect, not simply as addicts, identify their strengths, and avoid being judgemental. They hold clients responsible for their recoveries, but not their addictions, and are clear about their expectations and the consequences of clients' choices.

Assessment Uses Special Tools
Assessment of the family is an ongoing process. Substance abuse, parental abilities, risk of child abuse or neglect, family strengths, and community resources are all considered. A quarterly tracking form documents progress and the barriers to recovery. Many assessment tools are used, including The Family Risk Scale and The Risk Inventory for Substance Abuse-Affected Families which were developed by Project Connect.

Contracting Sessions
Contracting is based on the clients and staff agreeing they want to work together. In the first session, problems are identified and participants agree on goals. In the next 6 sessions a service plan is developed, usually addressing parental substance abuse, parenting skills, emotional problems, reunification issues, financial difficulties, and housing. Clients and staff of Project Connect, DCYF and AOD services review the contract quarterly.

Counseling Interventions
The staff use these counseling approaches:

  • Strengths Perspective, aiming to enhance self-efficacy and motivation by pointing out strengths and offering encouragement.
  • Person-Situation Reflection to help clients think about themselves and their decisions.
  • Reflective Discussion to help the worker understand the defenses and developmental factors affecting client's current behavior by asking direct questions about the past, especially about feelings.
  • Confrontational Skills (as opposed to being confrontational) are needed to support clients in making choices. Staff describe goals, behaviors that are not consistent with the goals, and outcomes of behavior. Staff write client's choices with their benefits and consequences on 3x5 cards. Clients then review the cards and by selecting a particular card, make an informed choice.

Energetic Advocacy
The Project staff are known as 'barrier busters', providing critical advocacy to help families overcome lack of transportation, inadequate housing, lack of child care and employment, low educational levels, and heavy expectations from the court, child welfare and AOD systems.

Termination
Most clients stay about one year. Termination is considered when clients have achieved these goals:

  • are able to transfer skills
  • have adequate aftercare resources
  • can stay sober
  • can function in their roles
  • can help others and know when they need help themselves.


11. AOD Treatment May Not Prevent Child Placement     top

Dore, Martha Morrison and Joan M. Doris (1998). Preventing Child Placement in Substance-Abusing Families: Research-Informed Practice. Child Welfare v77 n4 p407-426.

The authors evaluated a voluntary program funded by the National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect, which provides services to substance-abusing families to prevent child placement. The program includes:

  • in-home supportive counseling
  • linkages with addiction treatment programs
  • mentoring by older adults in the community
  • developmental daycare and respite care
  • parenting education
  • transportation
  • emergency resources, including funds, food, and clothing.

41% Completed Their Treatment
Forty one percent of the participants completed treatment, staying about 8 months. After 12 months, parents had made significant progress with other areas of their lives, with the exception of domestic violence and mental health, which the program counselors felt unqualified to address. The graduates had these characteristics:

  • participated in previous addiction treatment
  • used the program day care services
  • started substance abuse at age 21 or older
  • used only alcohol
  • had higher educational achievement.

Predictors of Child Placement
However, completing treatment was not as strong a predictor of preventing child placement as these variables were at predicting loss of custody:

  • younger age
  • never married
  • only one adult in the home
  • more than one child in the home
  • other children already in placement
  • involved with child protection for more than one year.

Addiction Treatment Programs Do Not Meet Mothers' Comprehensive Needs
Substance-abusing mothers are known to avoid and drop out of addiction treatment programs. Programs often demand that participants make sobriety their top priority, including ending relationships with substance-abusers and moving away from drug environments.

However, these mothers may depend on substance-abusing family and friends for financial and other support, and they may be in violent domestic relationships which will escalate if they attempt to leave. Sobriety may be the least pressing of these mothers' problems, which often include dealing with childhood abuse, poverty, unsafe neighborhoods and poor health. Family preservation programs of just 6-8 weeks cannot do more than identify substance-abuse and encourage parents to enter a treatment program.


12. The Seattle Advocacy Model Helps Mothers     top

Grant, Therese M., C. Ernst and Ann P. Streissguth (1996). "An Intervention With High-Risk Mothers Who Abuse Alcohol and Drugs: The Seattle Advocacy Model." American Journal of Public Health v86 n12 December p1816-1817.

The Seattle Advocacy Model uses paraprofessional advocates to work with high-risk, substance-abusing mothers who have multiple problems and who are least likely to receive preventive care. The goal is to provide a period of advocacy (three years) that is long enough to allow real change to happen. The Birth To 3 research and demonstration project is university-based and involves collaboration with existing community resources.

Advocates are Trained Paraprofessionals
The advocates working in the Birth To 3 project have past experience with high-risk populations, and receive training on substance abuse treatment, community resources, health and family planning, child development, and parenting skills, but are not required to have college degrees. They work with no more than 15 clients and their families.

Program Characteristics

  • Frequent contact and home visits help to build trust.
  • Professionals serving the client collaborate.
  • Written contracts are used to set down responsibilities and time lines.
  • Life skills are taught in concrete, logical steps and social and parental behaviors are modeled.
  • Close communication is established with clients' partners, neighbors and extended family.
  • Transportation and child care are provided.
  • Advocates receive strong supervision and attend regular staff meetings.

Results After Two Years

  • 80% of clients have received some alcohol or drug treatment.
  • 48% of clients have been abstinent from drugs and alcohol for 6 months or more.
  • 61% of clients now use regular birth control.
  • 93% of clients are receiving well-child care.
  • The cost per client per year is only $3,800.


13. Residential Treatment Works for Mothers and Children     top

Stevens, Sally J., Naya Arbiter and Robin McGrath (1997). "Women and Children: Therapeutic Community Substance Abuse Treatment." Pages 129-141 in Community as Method: Therapeutic Communities for Special Populations and Special Settings. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

The Amity Center for Women and Children is a nonprofit therapeutic community in Tucson, Arizona. In 1990, Amity received a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse for a research project that involved 40 mothers, half of whom were randomly assigned to have their children in treatment with them.

Program Features
The Amity program shares some of the traditional assumptions of therapeutic communities:

  • addiction requires a total lifestyle change
  • self-help not obedience is promoted
  • self-disclosure and sharing one's story are essential
  • the community is a microcosm of society
  • staff members are often recovering addicts
  • the residential stay is 15-18 months.

Unlike other communities, Amity encourages family members to visit and participate, and understands that mothers must use some of their energy to be available to their children.

Characteristics of Participants
The women in the program vary in their their ages, ethnicity, education, work history, drug history, and court involvement, but many had attempted suicide and/or were victims of sexual assault.

Better Outcomes For Mothers With Children
Preliminary data show that women accompanied by their children in treatment had better outcomes than women without their children. They were more likely to maintain custody of their children, be employed or receive assistance, and less likely to relapse and be arrested.


14. Some Mothers Have Better Prospects     top

Carten, Alma J. (1996). Mothers in Recovery: Rebuilding Families in the Aftermath of Addiction. Social Work v41 n2 p214-223.

New York City established a Family Rehabilitation Program in 1989 for substance-abusing families as an alternative to foster care. Cases are referred to the voluntary program only if children are not at risk at home, and drug-exposed infants have priority. The program provides an average of 9 months of services.

20 Successful Mothers Had Some Positive Characteristics
The cases of 20 mothers who had completed the program and had no child protection reports for six months were evaluated. The mothers had these successful characteristics:

  • their drug use was not long term
  • they had supportive family and friends whose help was solicited during and after the program
  • they wanted to be parents
  • most had high school educations and some had additional training
  • they felt hopeful about the future.

Success Factors Due to the Program

  • Staff work in teams.
  • Both intensive in-home and community services are offered.
  • Staff are culturally competent and many are minorities.
  • Caseworkers engaged supportive friends and relatives to help.
  • Service plans were developed cooperatively with clients.

Mothers Credit Caring Staff
The mothers at first felt angered by being referred to child protection, but the possibility of losing their children motivated them to participate in the program. They valued their relationships with the non-judgemental, caring staff, sharing decision-making using the service contracts, and being able to contact any member of their team for help. The staff also valued working with long-term clients because they could see positive results.


Web Resources     top

Get Started at DCFS Champaign-Urbana
To begin finding Web resources on substance abuse, start with the site from the Champaign-Urbana Field Office of the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services.
http://www.prairienet.org/dcfs/clientresources.html

Try the Yahoo Substance Abuse Page
The Yahoo web site includes many useful links.
http://dir.yahoo.com/Health/Diseases_and_Conditions/Substance_Abuse/

Link to Organization Web Sites
The National Association on Alcohol, Drugs and Disability offers this convenient list where you can link to web sites of the major public and private organizations working in the field of substance abuse.
http://www.ncadd.org/randr.html

Improve Your Skills or Become Certified
The National Association of Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Counselors web site includes a selected reading list for learning about substance abuse, as well as information on becoming a certified counselor.
http://www.naadac.org/how2coun.htm

Database of Alcohol Abuse Literature
The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism offers a searchable database of the published literature in this field, including abstracts,
http://etoh.niaaa.nih.gov/etohome.htm

Child Welfare League of America
Read the CWLA fact sheets and other reports on substance abuse at this location. Scroll to the bottom of the page to see links to the various reports.
http://www.cwla.org/chemical/chemicaldependency.html

Treatment Improvement Protocol Series
Read the complete text of these protocols at this location maintained by the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. After you link to the site click in the first pop-up box on the page. Scroll to the bottom of the list and highlight SAMHSA/CSAT Treatment Improvement Protocols then press the Select button.
http://text.nlm.nih.gov/

Mental Illness and Substance Abuse
This Dual Diagnosis Web Site offers a wealth of information to help clients with both mental illness and substance abuse problems.
http://www.erols.com/ksciacca/

Manual: Protecting Children in Substance-Abusing Families (1994)
Read the complete text of this manual offered by the National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect. Covers assessment of parents and children, court issues, and types of treatment programs.
http://www.calib.com/nccanch/pubs/usermanuals/subabuse/index.htm

GAO Report on Foster Care & Substance Abuse
This 1998 report discusses how substance abuse impedes foster care services in Illinois and California.
http://www.gao.gov/AIndexFY98/abstracts/he98182.htm

DHHS Report on Treatment Outcomes
This 1997 study found that treatment programs were cost effective in reducing substance abuse, although they did not improve employment or welfare status.
http://aspe.os.dhhs.gov/hsp/caldrug/calfin97.htm

Chicago Treatment for Opiate Dependencies
The Center for the Investigation and Treatment of Addiction offers a program located at the U of I Chicago to treat opiate dependencies.
http://www.CITA1.com/official/default.htm

List of Illinois Treatment Programs
The Illinois Alcoholism and Drug Dependence Association member organizations are listed here. They offer services for alcohol and drug prevention, intervention and treatment.
http://www.iadda.org/Providers.htm

National Database of Treatment Programs
This searchable database of Federal, State, and local treatment and prevention programs is provided by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
http://wwwdasis.samhsa.gov/98dir/default.htm

Interested in Listservs?
This site includes a list of e-mail discussion groups and listservs on topics related to substance abuse.
http://www.gwcinc.com/lists.htm

top